#Industry News
Multi-Resolution Spectrum Analysis in Modal Testing
Multiple passes of FFT yield a much finer resolution in the lower frequency region.
An efficient method to study structural dynamics is by carrying out a modal test. In order to analyze the mechanical properties of a structure, it is important to accurately measure the frequency and damping. With a regular FFT algorithm that is used to transform time domain signals to the frequency domain, a high block size would be required to obtain precise modal characteristics of the unit under test. However, this would increase the experimentation and computation time.
The latest 8.1 release of the Crystal Instrument’s EDM Modal software features multi-Resolution spectrum technology implemented into the MIMO FRF testing suite. Multiple passes of FFT yield a much finer resolution in the lower frequency region. This provides the advantage of a better estimation of the quality factor (or damping) and the amplitude of the frequency response functions at the resonant frequencies.
To compare the effect of multi-resolution and single resolution spectrum, a modal test is executed. The structure under test is a plexiglass plate that is supported using bungee cords to produce a free-free boundary condition. Two modal shakers are used to provide a white noise excitation to excite the plexiglass plate. The response of the plate is captured using a few uni-axial accelerometers.
The test configuration details are described here. A sampling rate of 5.1 kHz is used for the interested analysis frequency range of 2.3 kHz. The block size of 2048 yields 900 spectral lines which yields a frequency resolution of 2.5 Hz. A Hann window is used to reduce the leakage from the white noise excitation and response. A linear averaging mode of 32 is used to compute the linear spectrum.
An 8 times finer resolution of 0.31 Hz is obtained in the low-frequency range using the multi-resolution spectrum. This is achieved by using a large block size which is not needed in the high frequency region because of the dynamics of the test structure. This implementation of different resolutions produces better results without any increase in the loop time. The cutoff frequency dividing the low and high frequency range is 281.25 Hz. In this low-frequency region, the results from the multi-resolution tests are better because of the finer frequency resolution. After this cut-off frequency, the multi-resolution and single-resolution spectrum would yield comparable results since they have the same frequency resolution. All other settings, configurations and setup are the same for both multi-resolution and single-resolution tests.
The stability diagrams above show that the poles (frequency and damping) recognized with multi-resolution spectrum are more accurate because of their finer frequency resolution.
A similar MIMO FRF modal test was also carried out on a steel plate of high-quality factor to investigate the advantages of multi-resolution spectrum in calculating the quality factor and peak amplitude of FRFs. The results are shown below.
When zooming into the high-resolution region of the multi-resolution spectrum and comparing to the single resolution, the following spectrum graph is produced.
The image shows that in the cut-off frequency region, where the frequency resolution is much finer with the multi-resolution spectrum (green), the peaks at several resonance frequencies are much clearly identified. This is due to the much higher block size, which ultimately produces higher spectral lines. Therefore, the Frequency Response Function curve is much smoother and neater.
This also facilitates a more accurate calculation of the quality factor and peak amplitude of the FRF as shown in the table below. The table shows that the first four resonance frequencies that are present within the low-frequency cut-off region have a much higher Q and peak amplitude with the implemented multi-resolution spectrum. Also, in the high-frequency region, the frequency resolution for the single and multi-resolution spectrums are the same and hence the Q and peak amplitude for these resonances are also very close.
Resonant Frequency Damping Estimation Using MR Damping Estimation Using Regular FFT Q Estimation Using MR Q Estimation Using Regular FFT FRF Amplitude Estimation Using MR (g/LBF) FRF Amplitude Estimation Using Regular FFT (g/LBF)
960.94 Hz 0.0016074 0.01245702 311.069 40.138 12.269 2.832
1418.75 Hz 0.001596 0.00415103 313.292 120.452 10.687 3.274
1789.06 Hz 0.0051316 0.00955548 97.435 52.326 9.993 5.823
2453.13 Hz 0.0010845 0.0055879 461.059 89.479 60.277 18.42
5350 Hz 0.0039583 0.00396228 126.317 126.19 33.72 34.74
8462.5 Hz 0.002902 0.00269208 172.296 185.73 32.08 31.47
12725 Hz 0.0052911 0.00562019 94.498 88.965 186.23 187.72
The table above shows that the damping, amplitude and Q factor estimation using regular FFT methods are off from their true values by an order of magnitude of tens or hundreds. If people use these erroneous values to derive their conclusion about the structure and conduct further analysis, such as structure modification and optimization, the results would be inaccurate.
To learn more about EDM Modal software, visit: www.crystalinstruments.com/edm-modal-testing-and-analysis-software/
