video corpo cad
Add to favorites

#White Papers

Reliability Estimation of Coreless Brush DC Motors

Coreless brush DC motors convert electric power into mechanical power and are ideal in high-performance applications requiring low friction, low starting voltage, high efficiency, good thermal dissipation, and linear torque-speed characteristics.


Coreless brush DC motors convert electric power into mechanical power and are ideal in high-performance applications requiring low friction, low starting voltage, high efficiency, good thermal dissipation, and linear torque-speed characteristics. Miniature coreless brush DC motor design consists of a coreless rotor (self-supporting coil) combined with precious metal or carbon copper commutation system and rare earth or Alnico magnets.

Coreless brush DC motors are utilized in increasingly advanced devices with demand for higher power density in smaller packages such as insulin and infusion pumps, as well as biologic delivery devices. Since motor reliability is particularly important for manufacturers, this whitepaper illustrates the steps of the Weibull analysis method to predict the life of coreless brush DC motors. The Weibull analysis estimates the expected life of a motor using a complex mathematical model that is based on the test results of a few motor samples under simulated application conditions.(Figure 1)


The characteristics of a DC motor are represented by the motor’s speed torque curve. Figure 2 graph of a coreless brush DC motor with precious metal commutation shows torque on the X-axis and speed on the Y-axis.

The maximum continuous torque line represents the thermal limit of continuous motor operation under normal conditions. The region to the left of the maximum continuous torque line represents the continuous operating zone, while the region to the right represents the intermittent operating zone. In the intermittent zone, the motor can be operated for a duration that is limited by the thermal time constant and level of developed torque. As the motor approaches the peak torque rating, the duration of operation becomes shorter. Any operation above the continuous torque limit is also affected by the overall duty cycle.

The critical motor design factors defining reliability at various load points are also shown in Figure 2. Reliability at the high-speed load points (1 and 4) is a function of commutation and bearing design, while reliability at the maximum continuous torque load points (3 and 6) is a function of its thermal design. Reliability at any point on the right side of the maximum continuous torque line is the function of both thermal and mechanical design. The curve line shown by points 1, 2 and 3 show 95% of maximum continuous power, while points 4, 5 and 6 show 70% of maximum continuous power. Operating at 70% of maximum continuous power will result in higher reliability than operating at 95% of maximum continuous power.


With increasing demands for higher speeds from a coreless miniature DC motor, the stress on its commutation system or bearing design also increases. Increasing the maximum torque requirement also increases stress on the thermal and mechanical design of various motor subassemblies, showing that the reliability of the motor varies when operating at different load points (torque and speed combinations).

Identifying Application Requirements and Testing Plan

It is important to understand the application load points and motion profile, such as the torque-speed requirements over time with direction of rotation, the environment in which the application is operating (temperature, humidity, vibration etc.), and the life expectancy of the motor. Most equipment manufacturers have specific criteria regarding the life of the product they develop, which is tied to their warranty. The target life of a motor is a function of the expected life of the product.

Reliability is typically estimated by testing a few samples in a lab that replicate the actual operating conditions of the application. To test these conditions, a sample motor is mounted on a fixture, loaded with an eddy current or electromagnetic hysteresis brake and connected to a function generator. The brake applies constant torque to the motor output shaft as the function generator creates the required torque-speed-time characteristics, then loads the motor accordingly. The testing set up is designed to match closely to the customer specifications.

Ideally, 5 to 30 samples should be tested, which is dependent on motor availability, the required data accuracy, and the capabilities of the testing facility. The more motors that are tested, the higher the confidence level of the predicted motor life.

Reliability Testing and Weibull Analysis

Reliability tests are performed on each motor at the defined load points, duty cycle, and environmental conditions. The tests are designed to determine the failure point of the motor, with the failure criteria clearly defined before starting the test. Failures can be detected by observing a sudden increase in current drawn, overheating, high noise and vibration, or mechanical failure; therefore, a reliability engineer needs to measure the parameters continuously for changes against the baseline data.

Once time to failure (TTF) data of all samples has been collected (data from at least three samples is recommended), the failure data points are analyzed using the Weibull method. Weibull distribution plots are widely used for estimating reliability since the analysis is based on a generic distribution of data that can be used for all kinds of failure types (i.e., decreasing, constant, or increasing) depending on the beta value.

A Weibull distribution can be represented by a line (Appendix) on a Weibull probability plot or on log-log paper where the Y axis represents the failure rate or unreliability and the X axis represents the time to failure. The slope of this distribution or line is called the shape parameter (β). The intercept of this line with X axis is used to calculate scale parameter or characteristics life (η). The characteristics life is life at 63.2% of failure.(Figure 3)

The Weibull plot can result in the life of motor falling in either of three distinct regions, often called the famous bathtub curve. If β <1 than the failure are infant failures, this type of failures can be attributed to manufacturing problems like poor soldering, high axial play, wrong preloading, etc. If β = 1 then the failure rate is constant and are called random failures. This is the life where we mainly aim. If β >1 the failures are wear out failures or useful life failures and they increase with time.

Parameter Estimation of Weibull Distribution

The traditional approach to performing a Weibull analysis is the plotting method, which begins with initial assessment of the available data. The individual failure times are ranked based on the number of observed failures and suspensions, after which they are plotted on Weibull probability paper. A best-fit line can then be drawn through the data points, allowing analysts to determine the distribution’s fit to the data. The best-fit line will reveal the motors characteristic life (η) and determine if/how the failure rate is changing with time (slope = β).

In order to accommodate the manipulation of the Weibull CDF (Cumulative Density Function) F(t) into linear (y=mx+b) form, the y-axis of Weibull proabability paper is in a natural log, natural log scale and the x-axis is in a single natural log scale.

For better understanding we will discuss a case, where five DC motors of 16 mm size are tested at 70% Power and maximum speed (point 4 of Speed-Torque Curve), and all the test units were tested to failure with their failure times recorded. The recorded failure times are 1488, 2304, 1224, 2304 and 2976 hours. The failure times needs to be arranged in increasing order to calculate their Median Rank which will be used to plot the data points in probability paper.

The purpose of ranking the individual failures is to determine the y-coordinate values for the Weibull plot. The x-coordinate values, on the other hand, are simply the times at which the individual failures occurred.

Find all details and figures on


  • La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
  • Portescap SA